In an almost empty council chamber at County Hall a public inquiry has been sitting this week that could have major consequences for the political identity of Exeter.
The inquiry has been examining recommendations from the Boundary Commission to create an extra parliamentary constituency in Devon and to hive off Exeter west of the Exe into it.
Because Devon�s population has grown, the county is entitled to one more MP.
The new seat has to go somewhere and the Commission has recommended it should go in the middle of Devon covering a large part of Dartmoor, but including the Exeter wards of St Thomas, Exwick, Cowick and Alphington.
When the proposals were announced back in May there were a great many objections.
The city and county councils both protested. Thousands of people in Exeter signed a petition against the plans. Hundreds more wrote individual letters of objection.
This week has been the opportunity for those and any one else who is interested to come and say their piece to a barrister, appointed by the Boundary Commission to conduct the inquiry.
When it is over, a the end of this week, he will go away and write his report. By June or July of next year, a decision will be announced. Either Exeter will be radically changed, with the city west of the Exe transferred into a huge rural constituency stretching nearly to Cornwall. Or Exeter will be preserved more or less as it is, losing Topsham and St Loyes into a new close-to-Exeter East Devon seat.
Having given evidence to the inquiry on Monday, I am impressed by the thoroughness of this process. Witnesses give statements, they are cross examined at length. Volumes of evidence are read, maps are studied. It is all in public.
I can think of a number of countries, that call themselves democracies, where the re-drawing of political boundaries has none of the independence, transparency or rigour of this.
|