So the battle lines are now clearly drawn for the next general election.
Gordon Brown�s spending review for the next three years maps out the Government�s priorities until 2008.
They include the traditional areas of education and health, which will continue to see large increases in investment.
But they include a number of others where the Government believes it needs to target resources.
More and better child care for pre school aged children. More money for tackling crime, including 20,000 extra community support officers.
Funding for ten thousand new affordable homes a year. More investment for transport, science and defence. And a commitment to meet the United Nations target on international aid by 2013.
This represents the longest sustained investment in public services ever. The Government can do it because Britain is enjoying its longest period of sustained economic growth ever.
Some have claimed that Gordon Brown is being over-optimistic. But his forecasts have been repeatedly proved right in the past.
In spite of all this extra investment, Government spending will still only be 41% of Britain�s GDP, much lower than in France, Italy or Germany and lower than it was under John Major�s Conservative Government in the mid 1990s.
The difference is that then we were spending much more on welfare and unemployment benefits and servicing the huge national debt. With unemployment and debt now low, we can invest the money productively on things from which we all benefit.
The Conservatives in my view, have backed themselves into a corner. They have said they will only match Labour investment on health and education. That would mean massive cuts in all other areas under a Tory Government.
And by saying they will use some of the health and education money to subsidise the better off to go private, they are also giving the impression they are not really committed to the schools and NHS that most of us use.
|